• 1 of 6 Frequently Asked Questions on DFA Passport and Authentication Services
  • 2 of 6 This is a drug-free workplace. Let's keep it that way.

    This is a drug-free workplace. Let's keep it that way.

  • 3 of 6 Philippine Statements During the 54th ASEAN Foreign Ministers' Meeting and Related Meetings
  • 4 of 6 International Humanitarian Law Day 2021
  • 5 of 6 Cooperative Month – October 2021
  • 6 of 6 National Human Rights Consciousness Week (NHRCW) 2021


Emergency Assistance Packs for Typhoon Odette Victims Arrive from Japan PASAY CITY, 24 December 2021– The Japanese Government through the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) delivered...


Award-winning coffee, chocolate from PH featured at Lao Food Festival   Philippine booth at the Lao Food Festival VIENTIANE, 26 January 2022 — Award-winning coffee and chocolate from the Philippines...


 A Statement on the demise of the Hon. Roberto R. Romulo The Department of Foreign Affairs condoles with the family of former DFA Secretary Roberto R. Romulo who passed away last 23 January....


JUser: :_load: Unable to load user with ID: 423

17 March 2015

The supplemental submission was conveyed to the Arbitral Tribunal on Monday, March 16.

We recall that on 16 December 2014, the Arbitral Tribunal submitted 26 questions to the Philippines requesting additional argument and information. The questions relate to issues concerning both the tribunal’s jurisdiction and the merits of the Philippines’ claims, including the Philippines’ principled claim challenging the lawfulness of China’s so-called “nine-dash line”.

The Philippines has submitted detailed responses and extensive additional information. The submission consists of 12 volumes totaling over 3,000 pages. Volume I consists of 200 pages of written argument. Volume II consists of a 200-page Atlas containing detailed information about 49 islands, reefs and other features in the South China Sea.

Preparing such an extensive submission in such short order required substantial effort and coordination from relevant concerned agencies.

The Philippines appreciates the evident care and attention the Tribunal is giving to the case, as reflected by the scope and detail of the Tribunal’s questions. The Tribunal has managed, with utmost professionalism, the difficulties created by China’s decision not to appear, taking care to make sure neither side is prejudiced by that decision.

The Philippines is confident that its answers to the Tribunal’s questions leave no doubt that the Tribunal has jurisdiction over the case and that the Philippines claims, including in particular its claims concerning the nine-dash line, are well-founded in fact and law. END